Multilevel Modeling

6. Multilevel Data Structures


It is well known that once groupings are created (consisting of individuals), even if their origins are essentially ‘random,’ individuals end up being influenced by their group membership. Such groupings can be spatial (e.g., areas) or non-spatial (e.g., communities). Hierarchies are one way of representing the dependent or correlated nature of the relationship between individuals and their groups. Thus, for instance, we can conceptualize a two-level structure of many level-1 units (e.g., individuals) nested within fewer level-2 groups (e.g., neighborhoods/places) as illustrated in Figure 2. Since individual outcomes are anticipated as being dependent upon the neighborhoods in which they live, responses within a neighborhood are more alike than different. When dependency is anticipated in the ‘population’ or ‘universe,’ they represent population-based or naturally occurring hierarchies.

Accounts on the OBSSR e-Learning site enable you to save notes as you read the contents of the site.  Notes are a way for you to save a spot on the site with your own comments and title applied to it.  Think of it as putting a sticky note paper in a book to remember a place and leave a thought or two of your own for later reference.

Figure 2

Figure of two level structure as described in text.

The importance of identifying and specifying the ‘higher’ levels is critical for multilevel research. Researchers must a priori specify why they think that there will be variation in the outcome at these levels over and above variation at the individual-level. Such thinking naturally leads to considerations of which levels to include in the model. For example, do we expect variation at the level of small neighborhoods (e.g., census blocks) or larger neighborhoods (e.g., census tracts)? The most common multilevel model is a two-level hierarchic nested modeling with many level-1 units within a smaller number of level-2 units, as exemplified in Figure 2. A multilevel structure can be cast, with great advantage, to incorporate a range of circumstances where one may anticipate clustering (Subramanian, Jones et al., 2003).
Subramanian, S., Jones, K., et al. (2003) Multilevel methods for public health research. In: I. Kawachi and L. Berkman (Eds.). Neighborhoods and Health. New York: Oxford Press. 65-111.